|
Bookends Interview
(Taken from the Internet site
http://www.bookends.co.uk)
Gerald Seymour is one of the most prolific, enduring
and globally successful British writers. Harry's
Game, back in 1975, dealt with the thorny issue of a
British agent infiltrating the Provisional IRA at a
sensitive time. It was a dramatic introduction,
pulling on Seymour's insider experience as a hard
news reporter for ITN. He adapted that knowledge
successfully on all his subsequent novels, and has
rarely erred in judgement and fact. His travels in
the thriller fiction world have taken in war crimes
in Croatia, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the
paranoia of the East German secret police, the Stasi,
second weapons building in Iraq, and, with his
latest book, A Line In The Sand, a mesmerising mix
of Iranian zealots after a British undercover agent
interspersed with torture from the Pinochet regime.
Seymour always manages to have an uncanny finger on
the future pulse.
HARRY DOHERTY spoke to him.
Given your subject matter, the recent attacks on
Iraq were a timely publicity stunt.
I�m writing about Iran, which is a more more
important player in the medium-long term than Iraq.
The degrees of possibility for major conflict
between Islamic society and western society is much
greater via Iran and those that follow Iran�s
teachings than the much more temporary situation in
Iraq. Temporary is the lifetime of a regime and the
lifetime of the Islamic world stretches for
centuries and millenniums.
Do you ever think that your work is time
sensitive?
I try to be topical. When I had a former life and
had a proper job, then my deadlines were measured in
hours and what I did would be on the screen within
24 hours, even in the pre-satellite days. The
challenge with books if you�re trying to write
topical/contemporary thriller fiction is that you�re
starting out two years prior to publication and so
to keep your eye on a ball that�s that far away is
next to impossible. If one is topical at the end of
the day, then you have to say that luck shone down.
I wrote Line In The Sand 15 months ago. Quite an
integral part was the role of somebody who had been
involved peripherally in the Chilean coup d�etat of
Pinochet and somebody who had been tortured by that
regime. When the publishers read the book close to a
year ago, they were saying �what�s all this about
Chile?�. And the wheels come round. Now, around
publication day, we have the Law Lords finally
making their decision on extraditing Pinochet.
Perhaps I should go for the lottery!
How do you start?
They all start with what is little more than a
newspaper photograph or headline, maybe an article
and something is squirreled away. This one started
with the story of the wife of a captain of an
American ship, which fired a missile on an Iranian
airbus in 1988. I cut out the relevant page of Time
magazine and kept it for a decade, knowing that at
some stage it would come up. The intriguing thing
was that the Iranians then planted a bomb underneath
his wife's car and it exploded as she was driving
down a freeway in California. What gripped me about
that story was that instead of saying �this is a
lady under threat who needs support�, the people she
worked with and her neighbours rejected her as a
pariah. I thought that was actually much more likely
to happen in real life than the supportive
community.
That is reflected in the characters in your book.
I was surprised that the main character never came
out and shouted that he had done what he had done
for his country.
But I had him pinched, pushed, prodded. The
intelligence services have no great respect for the
freelancers and amateurs who work for them. There is
a huge amount of entrapment in the intelligence
world and whether it be that guy who was the MD of
Matrix Churchill who was turned and went back again
and again to Iraq before the Gulf War, providing
huge intelligence or those poor devils who end up in
the ditches of South Armagh with a bin liner over
their heads, they�re used. Don�t ever look for
respect or support.
But there is also patriotism, such as the
character who forsakes a rich bank job for his
government security position.
It�s a tough old life. If you want another world,
then stick with the lovely late Catherine Cookson.
In the intelligence gathering world, it�s a
competitive envious self-serving world and
casualties are acceptable, and that is not just
thriller-speak.
So, name your sources.
I talk to people always off the record and on a
non-attributable basis. I�m always pleased when they
say �I�m talking to you because you�re not a
journalist.� I miss the black gallows-humour of
journalism. I miss being in the know. When I meet my
old friends, like Michael Nicholson and Martin Bell,
I always feel inadequate, but I think they envy me
for what I do. When Bell got up in the House of
Commons and said that he didn�t think that the
bombing of Iraq was a good idea from his POV (point
of view, doncha know), I took that as being a
significant statement. Most of those who were
trumpeting it hadn�t the faintest idea what they
were talking about.
Was it a good idea?
I wrote about Iraq just before the Gulf War and I
wrote about their weapons of mass destruction, i.e.
their nuclear programme. At that time, it was denied
and it was only when the war started they came back
to it. When Condition Black came out, I recall
feeling a sense of evil about that great grinning
face of Saddam Hussein. I don�t usually get involved
in those type of feelings. If things damage that
regime, then I am basically in favour of it. I
believe that we have to stand up and have a posture
against evil.
Does that make it tough for you being a novelist
and outside the grand scheme of things. Do you think
you can make an impression?
You have to be very careful. I think I do have an
influence, not as immediate and direct as when
Channel 4 news is on a soapbox, but I reach a lot of
people through paperbacks. I suppose I get them when
they are more receptive than when they�re sitting on
their bums at the end of the day watching television
or snatching through the newspaper on the way to
work. I think that because of the area of choice
that is involved in buying or borrowing and then
reading a book, I think I get through to them. But
I�m not trying to say �Hey, I understand that great
scheme of things.� I�m saying if you came with me
and met the people that I met that these are the
sort of emotions, the sort of experiences and the
sort of sights that you would be exposed to. You
have to entertain and if you fail to entertain then
you have no readers. Through entertaining, you can
also inform people. It�s very easy and also very
wrong not to give a credit to people�s intelligence.
The idea that you may jilt people and even upset
them and that therefore they won�t like it is a
completely fallacious one. If you can walk that
fairly narrow tightrope between tragedy and lurid
melodrama, and be slightly on the side of tragedy,
then I think you have won, and people will bless you
and thank you for it.
You wave flags, and the biggest is that English
democracy is a central theme. There is a core of
Englishness, which can be quite annoying.
I may put the establishment down. I may put the
apparatus down, but I am an English writer and I
suppose I have to believe in an inherent nobleness
of character, which people in many corners of the
world would dispute. My heroes, or central
characters, are mostly small people, and they�re
mostly people who are caught in the vortex. In the
real world, the people I think are heroes are people
like the man when a ferry turned over who made his
body a bridge in the darkness so that other people
could get out. Those are the sort of people that I
grope towards, people who are compelled to do things
out of an inherent sense of decency. The Irish write
about the Irish. The Americans write about the
Americans. If you�re an English writer, and also if
you�re a bit old-fashioned, that�s what I go for. I
like the understated aspect of Englishness, which is
under threat at the moment. A calmness. Not
flamboyant. Quiet people of few words. We�re not
overly ambitious. That is an Englishness that I
admire. Those are the people I�m trying to write
about.
�
|